|
|
![]() |
Mike
McFadden, MSU Dairy Agent, Isabella County
Herb
Bucholtz, Department of Animal Science, Dairy Cattle Nutrition
Mike
Allen, Department of Animal Science, Dairy Cattle Nutrition
Michigan
State University
E.
Lansing, MI 48824
Corn
should be harvested for silage when the whole plant dry matter is between 30 and
35% DM. The recommended harvest
moisture ranges are the same for drought stressed corn as for corn grown under
ideal soil moisture conditions (table 1).
During
drought conditions some of the corn plants may appear quite dry because the
leaves are brown and dry but just the dry leaves is not an accurate indicator of
whole plant dry matter content. The
stalk, cob and grain contain the majority of the whole plant moisture.
Attempting to predict when to harvest corn for silage based on just
looking at parts of the plant may result in the corn being harvested at less
than idea dry matter levels. The reason whole plant dry matter at harvest is so important,
is that the ideal dry matter for the silage fermenting bacteria and the
prevention of silage juice seepage is between 30-35% DM.
Harvesting at dry matters lower
than 30% (too wet) can result in an undesirable silage fermentation process that
may results in unpalatable silage that can reduce cow dry matter intake.
Also, corn silage harvested at wetter than 30% dry matter (70% Moisture),
will usually result in seepage run-out from silage storages.
Harvesting at whole plant dry
matter above 35% DM (too dry) can result in a poor fermentation because the
material was too dry and there was not sufficient moisture for the fermenting
bacteria and for adequate packing. The
silage may not contain sufficient acid levels and may start heating during
feed-out for the silo or bunker. In
addition, silage drier than 35% DM might have decreased digestibility of fiber
and starch.
Whole
plant dry matter should be monitored starting a few weeks before traditional
corn silage harvesting dates. The
dry matter content of corn plants can decrease rapidly once the plant starts to
dry down. When dry matters start to
approach 30% monitoring every day or two of plants from different fields will
help assure that no fields will be harvested outside of the desirable dry
matters. Drought stressed corn can
dry down very rapidly if the plants are not actively growing especially on days
when the temperature is very hot and there are strong dry winds.
Table 1.
Recommended harvest dry matter for different types of storage structures.
|
Storage
Structure |
%
Dry Matter Ranges |
|
Bunker |
30 – 35 |
|
Upright – non-sealed |
32 – 40 |
|
Sealed Upright |
32 - 40 |
|
Silage Bags |
32 - 40 |
The
only way to accurately determine when the whole corn plant is at 30% dry matter
is to use a moisture tester. A
Koster™ moisture tester or microwave oven can be used to obtain an accurate
dry matter.
Hand
cut 15-20 whole corn plants at the normal chopping height (about 4-6”) from
throughout a field but not from headrows because the plants might be drier
there. Chop the entire stalks into
silage particle sizes. Monitor
those fields and locations every 2 to 3 days by again obtaining 15-20 stalks for
dry matter testing. This method
will track the changes in dry matter and the rate at which the plants are drying
down. This will aid in predicting
when to start harvesting.
Kernel Milk Line or Kernel Dry Matter as a Method
to Determine Whole Plant Dry Matter
Kernel milk line has been found to not be an
accurate indicator of whole plant dry matter.
Research at Michigan State University and elsewhere found that the whole
plant dry matter varied as much as 15% when kernel milk line was used to predict
whole plant dry matter. Thus kernel
milk line is not an acceptable method to use to predict whole plant dry matter.
Kernel dry matter has also been found to not be an
accurate indicator of whole plant dry matter.
This is the case for drought stress and non-drought stressed corn
kernels.
Thus the only accurate and acceptable way to monitor
whole plant dry matter for deciding when to harvest corn for silage is to use a
Koster™ moisture tester or the microwave oven method.
Nitrate Toxicity Potential
High nitrate
concentrations in corn plants and corn silage can potentially be toxic to
cattle.
Nitrates are normally
taken up by plants from the soil and utilized for the synthesis of plant
protein. During drought conditions
plant growth is impaired and nitrates can accumulate in the plant (table 2).
If sufficient rainfall occurs allowing for resumption of normal plant
growth (this re-growth process takes a few days to start) the accumulated
nitrates will be incorporated into plant protein.
Table
2. Nitrate (NO3) levels in drought-stressed corn plants.
|
Plant part |
NO3 (parts per
million) |
|
Leaves |
284 |
|
Ears |
75 |
|
Upper 1/3 stalk |
678 |
|
Middle 1/3 stalk |
3,557 |
|
Lower 1/3 stalk |
24,471 |
|
Whole plant |
4,333 |
During the silage
fermentation process the fermenting bacteria utilize plant nitrates for their
growth process. Therefore,
nitrate concentrations of drought stressed corn plants will be lower after the
plants have undergone the fermentations process.
The exact reduction of nitrate concentrations cannot be predicted.
If the potential of nitrate toxicity is a concern, testing for nitrate in
the silage should be done after the forage material has gone through the entire
fermentation process, about 4 weeks. Green
chopping or grazing of drought-stressed corn is not recommended because of the
potential for nitrate toxicity.
Ensiling
of potentially high-nitrate containing forages can also result in production of
various nitrogen oxide gases. These
gases are highly toxic to humans and livestock.
The danger of silo gas can exist from ensiling time to 4 weeks later.
During this period, do not enter a silo without first running the blower for 15
to 30 minutes. Using a
self-contained breathing apparatus is highly recommended.
Any person exposed to silo gas should seek immediate medical attention to
combat delayed poisoning symptoms.
The
concentrations of nitrates in a feed ingredient and the recommended feeding
rates of that ingredient are in table 3.
|
NO3 |
NO3-N |
|
|||
ppm
|
Percent
|
ppm
|
Percent |
Feeding Recommendations |
|
|
<
4,400 |
<
0.44 |
<
1,000 |
<
0.1 |
Safe
to feed, non-toxic level |
|
|
4,400-8,800 |
0.44-0.88 |
1,000-2,000 |
0.1-0.2 |
Limit
the feed to less than 50% of ration dry matter |
|
|
8,800-17,600 |
0.88-1.76 |
2,000-4,000 |
0.2-0.4 |
Limit
the feed to less than 25% of ration dry matter, do not feed to pregnant
cattle |
|
|
>
17,600 |
>
1.76 |
>
4,000 |
>
0.4 |
Do
not feed |
|
|
%=>
ppm (multiply % by 10,000) |
ppm=>
% (divide ppm by 10,000) |
||||
Laboratory Testing for Nitrates
Corn plants and corn
silage can be tested for nitrates by many commercial feed-testing laboratories.
This testing is also available at the MSU Soil and Plant Nutrient
Laboratory.
MSU Soil and Plant Nutrient Laboratory
A-81
Plant & Soil Sciences Building
Michigan
State University
East
Lansing, MI 48824-1325
(517)
355-0218
Care must be
taken in sampling to ensure a representative sample.
Grab samples should be taken from chopped forage from various locations
in the field, which represents all levels of plant stress.
Mix these samples in a bucket and place approximately one pint of
material in a sealed plastic bag. Time
between sampling and arrival at the laboratory must be as short as possible.
Refrigeration of samples is beneficial, especially when the lag extends
beyond one day. Green or wet
samples allowed to stand at room temperatures or higher may lose nitrate via
plant enzyme and bacterial activity.
All
laboratories do not express plant nitrate concentrations in a similar manner.
Table 4 contains multiplication factors to convert various nitrogen
compounds to nitrate (NO3).
Table
4. Multiplication conversion factors for various nitrogen compounds to nitrate (NO3).
|
Nitrogen Substance |
Chemical Formula |
Multiplication Factor |
|
Nitrate |
NO3 |
1.00 |
|
Nitrite |
NO2 |
1.35 |
|
Nitrate-nitrogen |
NO3-N |
4.43 |
|
Nitrite-nitrogen |
NO2-N |
4.43 |
|
Sodium nitrate |
NaNO3 |
0.73 |
|
Potassium nitrate |
KNO3 |
0.61 |
During
the 1988 drought which was wide spread in Michigan, whole corn plant samples
were obtained from the areas affected by the drought on various dates and were
tested for nitrates at the MSU Plant Diagnostic Clinic. The
results are shown in the following table 5.
Table 5. 1988 Michigan State University’s analysis
of for nitrates.
|
Material |
Sample Dates |
NumberSamples
|
Average Concentration NO3 (ppm) |
Range NO3 (ppm) |
Fresh Corn
Plants
|
7/21/88
– 8/1/88 |
21
|
8,800 |
20.0
– 17,100 |
|
|
8/2/88
– 8/5/88 |
28
|
6,600 |
400
– 16,000 |
|
|
8/5/88
– 8/12/88 |
14
|
3,700 |
300
– 11,600 |
|
|
9/1/88
– 9/28/88 |
40
|
3,500 |
20
– 25,000 |
Corn Silage
|
|
17 |
880 |
20
– 3,500 |
Fresh Sudan
Grass
|
|
5 |
11,300 |
600
– 35,000 |
Sudan Grass
Silage
|
|
2 |
3,800 |
1,750
- 6000 |
|
D.
Roberts, Michigan State University, Plant Diagnostic Clinic, 1988 |
||||
The
data in table 5, indicate the following:
(1)
1988 Drought in Michigan – The drought in 1988 started in mid-June.
When the first sampling period (7/21-8/1/88) was conducted the corn
plants were already subjected to at least a month of drought conditions.
The data in table 5 represents only what occurred in 1988.
This data does not indicate what the nitrate concentrations might be on a
given date for other years.
(2)
Fresh Corn plants – The data in table 5, is expressed as average and ranges for the 4
sampling date periods. Note the
wide range in nitrate concentrations for each of the sampling periods.
This indicates that concentrations were very variable due to the
variability of drought conditions at the field locations where the plant samples
were obtained.
The data in table 5, does indicate the nitrate
concentrations in the samples obtained in 1988 from across the state decreased
as growing season progressed. However,
data on rainfall or growing conditions occurring during the testing period from
the areas where the samples were obtained is not known.
Thus, nitrate concentrations for years other than 1988 will probably be
different. Testing of whole corn
plants for nitrate concentrations is the only way to know the nitrate
concentrations for a particular field of corn.
(3)
Corn Silage - Average nitrate concentrations was 880 ppm, which is much lower than
for the fresh corn plant material. It
is not known if plants from the field where the “Fresh Corn Plant” samples
were obtained were part of the sample tested as “Corn Silage”.
So, the exact percent of nitrate that was reduced by silage fermentation
cannot be predicted from this data.
(4)
Corn Silage - All corn silage samples in 1988 had nitrate levels that were within
the safe
guidelines (table 3)
for feeding to cattle. Hopefully
similar results as what occurred in 1988 will occur in other years.
That is, high nitrate levels occurring during the mid-late growing season
will be lower as harvest date approaches and also lower in the silage after
fermentation has occurred. For
farmers the recommendation is to test the silage for nitrates before feeding if
there is a concern.
Chopping Height Recommendations as Related to Nitrate Toxicity
Some publications suggest
that drought-stressed corn be chopped 12-16” above normal
chopping height (4-6”) as a method to reduce nitrate concentrations.
The lower 1/3 of the stalk may contain the highest nitrates
concentrations (table 2). Although,
the lower 1/3 of the stalk may contain the highest nitrate levels the silage
fermentation process will reduce the nitrate levels.
The whole plant nitrate levels are more important than just the
concentration in a part of the plant. The
chopping at 12-16” above normal chopping height will reduce whole field yields
by about 5-10% for normal non-drought stressed corn, this yield reduction will
probably be greater for drought stressed corn.
This yield reduction needs to be considered.
Michigan State University does not recommend chopping corn at 12-16”
above normal heights.
Microbial
Inoculants
– Chopped corn is fermented by the bacteria that are on the plants while the
corn was growing in the field. The
bacteria utilize plant sugars as a substrate for growth.
Normally, corn plants have a sufficient population of silage fermenting
bacteria to support a good silage fermentation process.
The purpose of a microbial inoculant is to provide additional bacteria
that will result in an increase the rate of fermentation and production of acids
that keep the silage stable during storage.
Drought
stressed corn plants may not be well eared and have poor kernel development.
Under normal growing conditions corn plant sugars are converted to
starch, which is stored in the kernels. Earless
or poorly eared corn plants will have sufficient sugars to support good
bacterial growth because less of the sugars will have been converted to kennel
starch. High temperature and humidity that often accompany droughts
in Michigan will encourage silage fermenting bacteria populations to increase in
the field. Under these
conditions inoculants may not be cost effective.
However,
silage fermenting bacteria populations may be lower when the humidity is low and
temperatures are high, especially if there are hot dry winds.
Also, bacterial populations may be low when temperatures before chopping
are low, below 600, such as in the late fall.
Under, these conditions use of an inoculant specific for corn silage may
be cost effective.
NPN
Additives
– Anhydrous ammonia or urea is often added at harvest to increase the crude
protein content of corn silage. Because
drought-stressed corn plants may contain high concentrations of nitrates, which
are an NPN source, the adding of anhydrous ammonia or urea to drought stress
corn at harvest is not recommended. However,
if after the silage has fermented and if the nitrate level of the silage is
below 4,400 ppm, urea could be added to a ration as a degradable protein source
at feeding time.
Nutrient
Composition of Corn Silage from Drought Stressed Corn
Research
at Michigan State University found that corn silage grown during the 1988
drought had increased NDF (fiber) digestibility as compared to corn silage grown
during 1989 a non-drought stress, normal growing year (table 6).
Drought
stressed corn silage with no kernels or reduced kernel content will require the
feeding of more grain supplementation.
Once the diets using drought stressed corn silage are adjusted for
differences in corn silage NDF content, the milk production should not be
reduced and could possibly increase because of the higher NDF fiber
digestibility.
Table 6. Effect
of environment on fiber component and NDF digestibility of corn forage.
|
|
1988 (drought year) |
1989 (normal year) |
|
Growing
degree days (5/1–9/1) |
2387 |
2072 |
|
Precipitation
(inches 5/1–9/1) |
8.4 |
16.3 |
|
Dry
Matter Yield (Tons DM/Acre) |
4.01 ** |
9.49 ** |
|
NDF
(% of DM) |
40.8 |
42.2 |
|
ADF
(sequential, % of DM) |
19.4 |
21.8 |
|
Lignin
(% of DM) |
2.44 ** |
2.96 ** |
|
Lignin
(% of NDF) |
6.02 ** |
7.01 ** |
|
NDF
Digestibility (%) |
50.3 ** |
42.0 ** |
|
**
differences were significant |
||
|
M.S.
Allen, Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, E.
Lansing, MI |
||
Nutrient
Composition
There
are no direct laboratory analyses for NEL.
The NEL values reported from feed analysis laboratories are
calculated indirectly using equations, most often based on the ADF content of
the feed. Some laboratories may use
equations that include NDF, lignin, crude protein NDIN, ADIN, fat and ash to
estimate NEL. Regardless
of what equation is used, all NEL values are only estimates.
The only way to accurately evaluate the energy value of a feed is to
evaluate actual cow response to a diet. If
dry matter intake, milk production, milk composition or body condition change
when cows are switched to a new ration than the ration should be evaluated and
formulation adjustments made. With
drought-stressed corn silage if NEL value used to formulate a ration
is too high or low the cows will indicate this with changes in dry matter
intake, milk production, milk composition or body condition.
This evaluation may take a period of time and cause a degree of producer
and nutritionist frustration.
Corn silage that is grown under drought conditions can present challenges. Reduced tonnage per acre, which will require more acres to be chopped. Since hay yields may also be reduced, farmers may need to plan on feeding more corn silage to their cattle. This will require chopping more acres of corn than normal and probably have impact on the number of acres of corn that were planned to be harvested for grain. Farmers will need to determine which corn fields will be harvested as grain and which will be chopped for silage. Monitor the whole plant dry matter content so that fields will be harvested at the correct dry matter.
|
Branch County Extension 570
Marshall St. Suite C Phone 517-279-4311 Fax 517-278-5064 |